Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking as a consequence of a concerned citizens observations of a stash location. Crown witnesses were cross-examined at length during the preliminary inquiry. At the end of the day the prosecutor conceded the problematic nature of its case and entered a stay of proceedings.
8. Regina v. KK [British Columbia Supreme Court, Kamploops – July 2009]
Client charged with possession of cocaine (approximately nine ounces) for the purpose of trafficking as a consequence of police search of client’s home with warrant. Notwithstanding the sizeable amount of cocaine seized our client managed to avoid a jail term and the matter was resolved by way of a Conditional Sentence Order (curfew) of one year.
9. Regina v. G&G [Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary – September 2009]
Clients (brothers) charged with possession of cocaine (approximately two kilograms) for the purpose of trafficking and proceeds of crime (approximately $40,000.00 cash) as a consequence of police search of their motor vehicle. As a consequence of cross-examination of the police by the defence at the preliminary inquiry it was determined that certain officers were less than forthcoming (to put it delicately) in their sworn testimonies concerning the actual facts surrounding the search and seizure. As a consequence of the foregoing …
10. Regina v. H.H. [Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary – September 2009]
Client was the primary target of a five month police investigation resulting in two counts of trafficking in cocaine, one count of possession for the purpose of trafficking and the seizure of in excess of five kilograms of cocaine. Client was accused of selling one ounce on the first occasion, two kilograms of cocaine on the second occasion and being in possession of three kilograms on the third. At the conclusion of Q.B. trial proceedings the learned trial Justice entered …
11. Regina v. K.L. [Provincial Court of Alberta, Calgary – December 2009]
Client charged with possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking as a consequence of police seizure of multiple pounds of marijuana and grow paraphernalia from a van driven by client. Case defended by challenging the constitutionality of the search, problematic continuity of critical material evidence and problematic service of the certificates of analysis. At trial all charges were completely dismissed and all seized property recovered.
12. Regina v. T.W. [Provincial Court of Alberta, Calgary – December 2009]
Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking, proceeds of crime and possession of stolen property. Client “high” on crack cocaine crashes stolen vehicle into yard of Calgary residence where police seize various items including substantial cash, scales, score sheets and multiple “teardrops” of cocaine. During the first day of trial the Crown closed its case and the defense moved for a directed verdict. The learned trial judge reserved his ruling on the application until day two …
1. Regina v. T.L. [Calgary Provincial Court, January 2008]
Client charged with seven offences including possession of cocaine and codeine for the purpose of trafficking and weapons as a consequence of police search and seizure under warrant of client’s home. Problematic continuity of material evidence resulted in a complete withdrawal of all charges at Preliminary Inquiry.
2. Regina v. M.H. [Banff Provincial Court, January 2008]
Client “partying” in motor vehicle with friends when police arrive and conduct a search of the vehicle and its occupants. Police seize approximately a half ounce of cocaine and related paraphernalia and charge client with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. Prosecution terminated prior to actual court proceedings due to perceived insurmountable search and seizure Charter issues.
3. Regina v. N. P. [Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary, March 2008]
Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking and proceeds of crime as a consequence of the seizure of approximately 33.1 grams of cocaine, 3 cellular phones and cash by the police from a vehicle driven by client. All charges successfully resolved by way of a stay of proceedings on the first day of the scheduled Queen’s Bench trial.
4. Regina v. L. V. [Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary, March 2008]
Client charged with nine counts including possession of cocaine (2 kilograms), marijuana, hashish, esctasy for the purpose of trafficking, proceeds of crime and possession of a loaded handgun as a consequence of police search of residential premises by way of a drug warrant. All charges successfully resolved by way of a stay of proceedings on the first day of the scheduled Queen’s Bench trial.
5. Regina v. C.M. [Mayerthorpe Provincial Court, April 2008]
Client with no prior criminal convictions charged with possession of marijuana contrary to section 4(1) of the Controlled Drug and Substances Act. Search and seizure challenged on constitutional grounds and charge completely withdrawn on date of trial.
6. Regina v. W.K. [Calgary Provincial Court, April 2008]
Client charged with trafficking in marijuana, possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking and proceeds of crime as a consequence of client’s dealings with an undercover peace officer and a seizure from client’s motor vehicle. Prosecution was challenged relative to problematic identification and constitutional issues resulting in complete withdrawal of all charges.
7. Regina v. J.Y. [Calgary Provincial Court, May 2008]
Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking (half a pound), proceeds of crime and breach of a recognizance. Search and seizure successfully challenged on constitutional grounds and a entered on all charges.
8. Regina v. S.M. [Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary, May 2008]
After a six month police investigation involving physical and technical surveillance police search of residential premises resulted in a seizure of 3 pounds of crack cocaine. Client was charged with three counts of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking, manufacturing cocaine and three counts of possessing proceeds of crime. A stay of proceedings was ultimately entered against S. M. on all charges.
9. Regina v. W.H. [Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, June 2008]
Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking, possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking, proceeds of crime and three weapons offences as a consequence of a police search of a motor vehicle. Subsequent to preliminary inquiry and prior to commencement of trial a stay of proceedings were entered on all charges due to perceived insurmountable search and seizure constitutional problems.
10. Regina v. T.E-H. [Calgary Provincial Court, June 2008]
Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking and proceeds of crime. All charges completely withdrawn prior to commencement of preliminary inquiry through negotiation with the Crown as a consequence of insurmountable constitutional search and seizure issues.
11. Regina v. C.B. [Calgary Provincial Court, June 2008]
Client pulled into a check stop and was charged with impaired driving, operating a motor vehicle over 0.08, possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking, proceeds of crime and possession of cocaine. The police also seized (very expensive) S.U.V. This multifaceted prosecution was ultimately resolved by way of a plea of guilty (for which our client received a small fine) and a complete withdrawal of all other drug charges. As for the drinking and driving prosecution the matter was …
12. Regina v. M.E. [Calgary Provincial Court, June 2008]
Client charged with possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking, simple possession of marijuana and proceeds of crime as a result if the police search of his motor vehicle. The matter was ultimately resolved by way of a plea of guilty to simple possession of cocaine ($500.00 fine) and a complete withdrawal of all other charges. All money seized by the police under the proceeds charge were also returned to our client.
13. Regina v. L.M. [Calgary Provincial Court, June 2008]
Client was charged with possession of cocaine of the purpose of trafficking and simple possession of marijuana as a consequence of the execution of a warrant to search on our client’s home. As a consequence of search and seizure Charter issues germane to the search this prosecution was resolved by way of a guilty plea to simple possession of a controlled substance and all other charges were completely withdrawn.
14. Regina v. C.O. [Calgary Provincial Court, June 2008]
Client was charged with possession of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking and proceeds of crime as a result of a police search of our client’s motor vehicle. Search and seizure challenged on constitutional grounds resulting in the complete withdrawal of all charges and the return of money seized to our client.
